Since their introduction in 1993, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have exploded in popularity with investors. These instruments—equity portfolios tracking an index and tradable intraday like stocks—have provided cost savings and diversification benefits for institutional managers as well as individuals.
Of course, ETFs have pitfalls as well, from low liquidity in some cases to the risk and complexities of the most speculative varieties of exchange-traded funds. Identifying the advantages and disadvantages of ETFs can help investors decide whether these securities make sense for their portfolios, and to maximize their rewards while reducing the risks.
Key Takeaways
- ETFs are considered to be low-risk investments because they are low-cost and hold a basket of stocks or other securities, increasing diversification.
- For most individual investors, ETFs represent an ideal type of asset with which to build a diversified portfolio.
- In addition, ETFs tend to have much lower expense ratios compared to actively managed funds, can be more tax-efficient, and offer the option to immediately reinvest dividends.
- Still, unique risks can arise from holding ETFs, as well as tax considerations depending on the type of ETF.
- Vehicles like ETFs that live by an index can die by an index with no nimble manager to shield performance from a downward move.
Advantages of ETFs
ETFs, which compete with mutual funds but trade like stocks, have some notable advantages over those alternatives.
Diversification
One ETF can give exposure to many stocks from a particular industry, investment category, country, or a broad market index. ETFs can also provide exposure to asset classes other than equities, including bonds, currencies, and commodities. Portfolio diversification reduces an investor’s risk. Duplicating that benefit by buying individual stocks would be much more cumbersome in terms of the research and trading required, and likely more expensive.
Trades Like a Stock
An investor requesting a mutual fund redemption during the trading day can’t really be sure of the redemption price. That will depend on where the fund’s net asset value lands when it’s calculated at the end of the day. In contrast with mutual funds, ETFs:
The most popular ETFs trade with more liquidity than most stocks, meaning there are always plenty of buyers and sellers keeping the bid-ask spreads low.
Lower Fees
ETFs, which are passively managed, tend to have significantly lower expense ratios than the mostly actively managed mutual funds. What drives up a mutual fund’s expense ratio? Costs such as a management fee, fund accounting and trading expenses, and load fees for sale and distribution.
Immediately Reinvested Dividends
The dividends of the companies in an open-ended ETF are reinvested immediately, whereas the exact timing for reinvestment can vary for index mutual funds. (One exception: Dividends in unit investment trust ETFs are not automatically reinvested, thus creating a dividend drag.)
Limited Capital Gains Tax
ETFs can be more tax-efficient than mutual funds. As passively managed portfolios, ETFs (and index funds) tend to realize fewer capital gains than actively managed mutual funds.
Mutual funds, on the other hand, are required to distribute capital gains to shareholders if the manager sells securities for a profit. This distribution amount is made according to the proportion of the holders’ investment and is taxable. If other mutual fund holders sell before the date of record, the remaining holders divide up the capital gain and thus pay taxes even if the fund overall went down in value.
Lower Discount or Premium in Price
There is a lower chance of ETF share prices being higher or lower than their actual value. ETFs trade throughout the day at a price close to the price of the underlying securities, so if the price is significantly higher or lower than the net asset value, arbitrage will bring the price back in line. Unlike closed-end index funds, ETFs trade based on supply and demand, and market makers will capture price discrepancy profits.
Disadvantages of ETFs
While the pros are many, ETFs carry drawbacks too. Among them:
Less Diversification
For some sectors or foreign stocks, investors might be limited to large-cap stocks due to a narrow group of equities in the market index. A lack of exposure to mid- and small-cap companies could leave potential growth opportunities out of the reach of ETF investors.
Intraday Pricing Might Be Overkill
Longer-term investors could have a time horizon of 10 to 15 years, so they may not benefit from the intraday pricing changes. Some investors may trade more due to these lagged swings in hourly prices. A high swing over a couple of hours could induce a trade where pricing at the end of the day could keep irrational fears from distorting an investment objective.
Costs Could Be Higher
Most people compare trading ETFs with trading other funds, but if you compare ETFs to investing in a specific stock, then the costs are higher. The actual commission paid to the broker might be the same, but there is no management fee for a stock. Also, as more niche ETFs are created, they are more likely to follow a low-volume index. This could result in a high bid/ask spread. You might find a better price investing in the actual stocks.
Lower Dividend Yields
There are dividend-paying ETFs, but the yields may not be as high as owning a high-yielding stock or group of stocks. The risks associated with owning ETFs are usually lower, but if an investor can take on the risk, then the dividend yields of stocks can be much higher. While you can pick the stock with the highest dividend yield, ETFs track a broader market, so the overall yield will average out to be lower.
Leveraged ETF Returns Skewed
A leveraged ETF is a fund that uses financial derivatives and debt to amplify the returns of an underlying index. Certain double or triple-leveraged ETFs can lose more than double or triple the tracked index. These types of speculative investments need to be carefully evaluated. If the ETF is held for a long time, the actual loss could multiply fast.
For instance, if you own a double-leveraged natural gas ETF, a 1% change in the price of natural gas should result in a 2% change in the ETF on a daily basis. However, if a leveraged ETF is held for greater than one day, the overall return from the ETF will vary significantly from the overall return on the underlying security.
Period | Double-Leveraged ETF ($) | ETF % Change | Natural Gas Price ($) | Nat. Gas % Change |
1 | 10 | 7.00 | ||
2 | 8.80 | -12.00% | 6.58 | -6.00% |
3 | 8.53 | -3.04% | 6.48 | -1.52% |
4 | 7.93 | -7.10% | 6.25 | -3.55% |
5 | 8.56 | 8.00% | 6.50 | 4.00% |
6 | 7.35 | -14.15% | 6.04 | -7.08% |
7 | 8.47 | 15.23% | 6.50 | 7.62% |
8 | 9.77 | 15.38% | 7.00 | 7.69% |
Total % Change | -2.28% | 0.00% |
A double-leveraged ETF does not always mean you will see double the return of the index. And the ease of investing in leveraged ETFs could entice individuals with little experience or understanding of the investment vehicle.
The Bottom Line
ETFs are used by a wide variety of investors to build a portfolio or gain exposure to specific sectors. They are like stocks in the way they trade but can also be compared to more broad investments, or even entire indexes, in their price movements. They have many advantages, especially compared to other managed funds such as mutual funds.
But there are also disadvantages to watch out for before placing an order to purchase an ETF. When it comes to diversification and dividends, the options may be more limited. Vehicles like ETFs that live by an index can also die by an index—with no nimble manager to shield performance from a downward move. Finally, the tax implications associated with ETFs (as with any investment) need to be considered when deciding if they are for you.
Investopedia does not provide tax, investment, or financial services and advice. The information is presented without consideration of the investment objectives, risk tolerance, or financial circumstances of any specific investor and might not be suitable for all investors. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.